Pro vs Max: Which Unlimited Plan Should You Pick?

The One-Line Difference

Pro ($100/mo) writes your articles with high-efficiency open models. Max ($200/mo) writes them with premium frontier models.

Everything else is identical: unlimited sites, 100 articles/day, AI Humanizer included, the full Pro plugin with Supermemory, trending topics, and Telegram control.

So the real question is: does model quality matter for your sites? Let's make that concrete.

The Pro Pool: GPT-5.6 Luna, Qwen 3.7 Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, Gemini Flash Lite

Don't let the prices fool you — this is not a "budget" tier. GPT-5.6 Luna leads the rotation with flagship-quality prose, Qwen 3.7 Flash (Alibaba) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash are genuinely competitive with premium models on structure and fact-respect, and GLM 5.2 (Z.ai) rounds out the roster on news, tech, sports, and evergreen topics.

The pool rotates roughly 55/20/15/10 across those four. In practice:

• News and sports: excellent. These models follow our fact-injection pipeline tightly and rarely embellish.
• Evergreen guides and listicles: very good. Structure is reliable; prose is workmanlike.
• Long-form opinion and deeply technical analysis: good, occasionally great. This is where the gap to premium models shows.

Pick Pro if: you run volume sites, niche news, affiliate content, or local-language content. The math is absurd — at 60 articles a day, Pro costs you about 5.5 cents per article, all-in.

The Max Pool: Claude Sonnet 5, GPT-5, Gemini 3.6 Flash, Grok 4.3

Max rotates across the frontier models at roughly 30/25/25/20. What you gain:

• Long-form architecture. Claude Sonnet 5 and GPT-5 hold a thesis across 2,000+ words, transition sections gracefully, and land conclusions that actually conclude.
• Tone control. Premium models bend further to a style brief — drier, wittier, more formal — without losing coherence.
• Fact discipline on thin sources. When the evidence pipeline has only two verified facts, frontier models speculate less.

Pick Max if: your brand voice matters as much as your volume, you publish in competitive English-language SERPs, you write analysis over reporting, or you're producing content you'd put your own byline on.

The Honest Overlap

Here's what we see in our own output: for a 900-word news article with good source facts, the difference between a Pro-pool article and a Max-pool article is often invisible to readers. The gap appears in scale-dependent quality — the 2,000-word analysis, the buyer's guide that needs to actually rank, the piece where a mangled fact costs you credibility.

A practical pattern many publishers use: Pro for the newsroom agents, Max for the flagship site. Both plans run side by side on one account — Max simply replaces Pro for its 30-day term when purchased.

What About Coins?

Coins still make sense for three kinds of work:

• 1.Model-specific jobs. Need exactly Claude Sonnet 4.6 for a client with a preference? Coins give you per-article model choice, every model, no rotation.
• 2.Bursts without commitment. 30 articles one month, zero the next — $3 of coins beats a $100 plan.
• 3.Humanizer and AI images on free accounts. À la carte features stay coin-metered for non-plan users.

Decision Cheat Sheet

Whichever you choose, the platform underneath is identical: multi-agent scheduling, cross-agent dedup, Supermemory, live sports mode, and the same publishing pipeline. The models write; you decide how fancy the writing should be.

Compare both plans side by side on the pricing page.